Why Insurers Use Weak Experts to Deny Claims
The biggest reason we see claims denied by insurers for property damage is unreliable ‘expert’ evidence (BTW- if you can call some of these people experts), in the domestic non-broker arena they are often related party preferred builders, repairers with a strong relationship with the insurer AND often the have never spent a day in Court giving evidence. They tell the insurer that they’re right and they don’t have to pay.
Those type of denials are our bread and butter and they’re also the most painful for an insured because they know. Something isn’t right.
But here is the thing, we love these claims, we will even run them ‘no win no fee’ as costs can be claimed at court in addition to the claim amount and don’t forget section 57 interest too.
If your insurer has wrongly denied your claim or they’re just delaying, don’t wait, in these situations talk is often cheap. What matters is:
This article is a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.
The amount of plumbing related building defects I see in Victoria is astonishingly high. Often they exceed all other defects. Yet the insurance that should respond has become a farce.
More and more I am seeing protection works disputes become disputes about access to land, adverse possession, boundary issues, building defects and property damage.
The headline change is that many of the Code's obligations are proposed to become legally enforceable. On paper that is a significant shift.
Burns v Corbett and later decisions mean tribunals are not Chapter III courts and cannot exercise federal jurisdiction. It is time to consider a national tribunal.