Building Contracts Explained: What Builders, Owners and Subcontractors Must Include to Protect Themselves
Construction contracts in Victoria need to not only balance risk but to comply with the new legislation and work with the new processes being introduced by the Building and Plumbing Commission.
With the amount of changes in Victoria it is no wonder builders, plumbers, consultants and contractors are unsure of where building law is now at.
Don’t worry, at BU Lawyers we have got you covered, we know the:
We have already began preparing new subcontractor forms that work with the new legislation and assist builder and subcontractors alike.
Owners should also understand the requirements of a building contract and there are many repercussions if the clauses are not properly considered and particularly in relation to understanding provisional sums, prime cost items and termination rights before signing.
Carefully drafted contracts reduce the likelihood of dispute and strengthen enforceability if proceedings become necessary.
At BU Lawyers we know building contracts, we know the new law and we want to know the ins and outs of your business or project to build contracts that suit your needs.
We are experts in building law, we turn around work quickly and efficiently and with building contracts we offer flat fees for standard work. Reach out and ask us how by emailing our intake team at BU Lawyers by emailing clerk@bulawyers.com.au or our practice manager paula@bulawyers.com.au.
This article is a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.
The amount of plumbing related building defects I see in Victoria is astonishingly high. Often they exceed all other defects. Yet the insurance that should respond has become a farce.
More and more I am seeing protection works disputes become disputes about access to land, adverse possession, boundary issues, building defects and property damage.
The headline change is that many of the Code's obligations are proposed to become legally enforceable. On paper that is a significant shift.
Burns v Corbett and later decisions mean tribunals are not Chapter III courts and cannot exercise federal jurisdiction. It is time to consider a national tribunal.