Don’t expect your PI insurance to cover you
Don’t expect your PI insurance to cover you!
That’s my advice to all the professionals out there, if you:
Don’t review the policy wording each year; or
Don’t complete the proposal form accurately; or
Don’t consider and make appropriate notification of circumstances that may give rise to a claim; or
Don’t consider if changes in your business have occurred and notify the insurer mid term.
Here is a hot tip from a person who’s worked in major PI claims, negotiated major PI contracts and worked as a lawyer for over 15 years dealing with professional liability and been a GC purchasing insurance:
Just don’t assume you are covered because you purchased a policy!
It’s a risk transfer based on words on a page. Based on disclosure under the insurance contract act and if you don’t carefully review those things and act accordingly…
Don’t assume you’ll be covered.
Of the tens of PI claims I see each month so many aren’t covered - and what’s worse is that each could be a BIG claim event.
So here’s my message, PI insurance is a contract and it’s a contract that renews annually and you need to work at it not just go through the motions.
Go to your Outlook calendar now, set aside a half day six weeks prior to your next renewal. Have a good read of your policy, get an hours advice from an insurance lawyer and make sure you are ready to properly engage with your broker for your next renewal.
After all, maybe speak to a few other brokers and see if what you’re doing at present is best practice!
This article is a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.
A building professional who can write a report and a building professional who can defend one under cross-examination at VCAT are rarely the same person, and the gap between them is costing property owners claims.
If water from a neighbouring property has damaged your home or investment property in Victoria, section 16 of the Water Act 1989 gives you a direct path to recovery, but only if you can prove exactly where the flow came from and why it was unreasonable.
When a property damage claim moves toward recovery, the tradesperson who fixed the problem and the expert who can prove liability in court are rarely the same person.