Are you a building contractor who hasn't been paid?
It happens, doesn’t it!?
“TOO often” - is what you are probably saying - especially if you have a current unpaid invoice, outstanding stage or payment.
AND
“TOO easy” - for the other party to basically say the work is defective or raise a dispute or just not pay.
I get it.
But what to do!?
You have pretty much have 3 options.
AND choosing 1 depends on what has happened…
BUT if it is a meaningful debt it is worth taking action and you need to demonstrate a reputation in the industry that if you don’t get paid there are repercussions…
Often this falls on deaf ears hence the need for action.
After engaging a lawyer, the process of negotiation will still arise, it can be a viable option but in my experience when another party will not pay, YOU need to take action first and promptly.
For building debts there are three realistic options:
Great option, can be a complicated process for small contractors but is worthwhile engaging with.
Cons: It isn’t amazingly quick, but it can be cheaper and simpler than litigation but you may need to go to court anyway to have an adjudication registered as a judgment debt. There are various issues including excluded amounts, this is going to improve with the new legislation (keep an eye out). But you still you need to understand how to submit a proper payment claim and follow a process.
Pros: Viable to avoid court and genuinely get paid. It will improve with new legislation (keep an eye out for our further advice).
Summary: a great tool but not for all situations.
Need: A corporation (not individual) who has not paid.
Don’t want: A genuine dispute over the debt, as this will not assist.
Conclusion: In my experience, this can be a useful tool but many debts are disputed for some arguably valid reason and suits certain circumstances.
Summary: You can commence proceedings at VCAT if you have a domestic building dispute (ie builder against owner where a major domestic building contract exists) or Court in the absence of this, eg. a contractor pursuing debt in various circumstances.
Why do I like this option? It is flexible. It’s downside is entering into a potentially costly process but for the same reason suing, as an action speaks volumes. It says I mean business and at Magistrates Court of Victoria you can be on for mediation at minimal cost very quick. You need a lawyer who knows the process, how to keep the statement of claim to the point and control recovery costs.
Bad debts. Have a plan.
This article is a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.
The amount of plumbing related building defects I see in Victoria is astonishingly high. Often they exceed all other defects. Yet the insurance that should respond has become a farce.
More and more I am seeing protection works disputes become disputes about access to land, adverse possession, boundary issues, building defects and property damage.
The headline change is that many of the Code's obligations are proposed to become legally enforceable. On paper that is a significant shift.
Burns v Corbett and later decisions mean tribunals are not Chapter III courts and cannot exercise federal jurisdiction. It is time to consider a national tribunal.