Combustible cladding legal proceedings and recovery costs for building professionals
Architects, Engineers, Building Surveyors, Roofers, Project Managers and other consultants or contractors who undertook design or carried out building work on residential strata are exposed to future proceedings to recover costs of combustible cladding removal.
Chances are that many parties will be part of a long list or Respondents at the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal or Defendants at the County Court of Victoria as the recovery efforts get underway to recover substantial costs that have been incurred to remove combustible cladding on Melbourne buildings.
As background, the recent case of State of Victoria v L.U. Simon Builders Pty Ltd [2025] VSCA 52 provided an important clarification on the State’s rights to recover those costs from the builder.
The Court’s decision is in support of the State’s right to recover under section 137F of the Building Act 1993 (Vic) after making payments to the OC both for itself and on behalf of individual lot owners. This entitles the State to be subrogated to the rights of both the OC and the individual lot owners.
This is significant news for builders, professional indemnity insurers, government lawyers in addition to owners corporations because future proceedings can now likely be expected and pursued and preparations may now be made to deal with same.
Given the substantial delays at the tribunal and the prospect of proceedings to be filed at the County Court where a commonwealth legal issue arises, I would not be surprised to see a surge in residential strata building disputes.
The unique issue with domestic building works in residential strata as opposed to single dwellings is that the loss claimed can be far higher and into the many millions. There can be extreme lists of multi-party defendants and respondents given the works conducted are akin to commercial buildings and therefore the legal strategies differ.
If you are seeking advice on the unique issues arising under defects related to strata reach out to our office. Our team continues to scale and have capacity in this specialist area.
This article is a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.
Water ingress from common property is one of the most common apartment defect issues we see. Lot owners dealing with leaking roofs, balconies or plumbing failures have a range of remedies available against the owners corporation at VCAT.
If you have witnessed misconduct or corruption in the building and construction industry, there are substantial legal protections available to you under the Corporations Act.
Purchasing a professional indemnity policy does not guarantee you are covered. Without careful review of your policy wording, accurate completion of the proposal form and proper notification of circumstances that may give rise to a claim, your PI insurance may not respond when you need it most.