Lawyers question value of LIV's Find a Lawyer referral service
Law Institute of Victoria - find a lawyer referral service…
To all the lawyers out there practising in Victoria, what do you think of this service?
Contrary to what some client’s believe, we as lawyers don’t get paid for providing advice through this service. In fact, the practice owners pay a small fee to the law Institute to be on the find a lawyer referral service database.
Irrespective, I truly believe that this is a community service and it is a way to of course establish clients, especially when practitioners are starting out.
I am reticent to end this service because I know it has offered value to many people… however, I am strongly considering ending our involvement…
Why?
This is just one example -
This week our practice manager was contacted from a client in New York who demanded a meeting within 24 hours!
We obviously needed to obtain conflict details and a meeting was booked after multiple interactions…
Anyway, we offered a Teams meeting with one of our lawyers on Friday afternoon and the client was a no show…no response - Nothing!
This is pretty typical and not a one off - Not a big deal but I even once had a legal practitioner masquerading as a client to get my advice in a free consult… I was shocked!
If you don’t pay for it, you don’t value it - maybe!?
Also, there are other ways to add value and pay it forward as so to speak… our firm has started researching issues and sharing information to influence legal change but I would love to know ways others have helped the community.
What do other practitioners think of this service and other methods to provide value?
This article is a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.
Recent articles
-
Security of Payment Legislation: What’s Changing and How Subcontractors Can Improve Debt Recovery
-
Unqualified Expert Witnesses in Building Claims
A building professional who can write a report and a building professional who can defend one under cross-examination at VCAT are rarely the same person, and the gap between them is costing property owners claims.
-
Suing for Water Damage Under Section 16 Water Act
If water from a neighbouring property has damaged your home or investment property in Victoria, section 16 of the Water Act 1989 gives you a direct path to recovery, but only if you can prove exactly where the flow came from and why it was unreasonable.
-
Gathering Expert Evidence in Property Damage Cases
When a property damage claim moves toward recovery, the tradesperson who fixed the problem and the expert who can prove liability in court are rarely the same person.