Level 1, 530 Little Collins St, Melbourne
Case Note: Plunkett v Portier Pacific Pty Ltd (Civil Claims) [2024] VCAT 205
Level 1, 530 Little Collins St, Melbourne
Do you have proceedings at VCAT? Should your case be referred to a Court instead? The recent case of Plunkett v Portier Pacific Pty Ltd considered this and was referred to the Supreme Court.
Under section 77 (1) of the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act (“the Act”) a proceeding can be struck out (essentially meaning ended at VCAT) and transferred to a Court.
The Tribunal has power to do this when it considers the subject matter of the proceeding would be appropriately with by a court or any other person or body.
The power is therefore very wide and not just limited to referring a case to a court. In this case the proceedings were referred to the Supreme Court.
This process can be triggered on the application of a party or on the Tribunal’s own initiative.
This was really because of size and complexity and its subject matter.
In the relevant case the applicant in the proceedings alleged sums due of $1,365,984 plus damages and interest and was about commercial dealings.
The respondents also stated in their application that the claim was complex, had multiple international parties and it was unsuited to resolution at the Tribunal.
The Tribunal said that given:
Maybe your case is more appropriately heard at Court and not at the VCAT.
For a range of reasons this could be the case for you but you still might not want to make such an application. Don’t assume because you have a large case that your case will be referred, or even that it is in your interests to do so.
BU Lawyers can help. We have acted in proceedings where applications have been both successful and unsuccessful in section 77 applications. We offer a no cost 1 hour conference to consider existing proceedings at the VCAT and whether your case is viable for referral.
This article is a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.
Recent decisions from various tribunals and courts have changed the operation of the VCAT. The cases of Burns v Corbett and Meringnage v Interstate Enterprises Pty Ltd (Meringnage) confirmed that the VCAT does not have the jurisdiction to hear 'federal matters', thus limiting the scope of matters it can determine.
The Fair Work Ombudsman has confirmed it is continuing investigations into the Construction, Forestry and Maritime Employees Union (CFMEU) following various allegations, including potential contraventions of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth).
A pilot program for a new National General Protections List in the Federal Court of Australia will begin on 1 September 2024 and run for eight months.
The Fair Work Ombudsman has issued proceedings in the Federal Circuit and Family Court against the operator of a residential building and construction business in south-west Sydney for allegedly failing to comply with a Compliance Notice.