Level 1, 530 Little Collins St, Melbourne
Employment Law update: Fair Work Ombudsman v J.D. Chapen Nominees Pty Ltd (in liq) [2024] FedCFamC2G 85
Level 1, 530 Little Collins St, Melbourne
A recent employment law matter in the Federal Circuit and Family Court saw the Fair Work Ombudsman rely on the accessorial liability provisions of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) to bring claims against the individuals (a former director, general manager and accountant) as well as the employing entity involved in contraventions of the Act.
The matter involved the determination of penalties for those involved in breaches of the Act by a group of companies referred to in Riley J’s decision as the “La La entities”. The La La entities underwent surprise audits in August 2019 after allegations that they were underpaying workers, denying workplace entitlements and paying workers cash-in-hand.
Prior to proceedings being commenced, the La La entities all entered liquidation and so no penalties were sought against any of the companies. Instead, the Ombudsman sought penalties directly against individuals involved in the contraventions, being a former director/shareholder of a number of La La entity companies (Mr Taiaroa), a former general manager of a number of La La entity companies (Mr Sanger), an accounting firm which provided accounting services to the La La entities (Nicholas Accounting Managers Services Pty Ltd) and the sole director of the accounting firm (Mr Nicolaou).
During the proceedings all parties reached separate agreements with the Ombudsman and admitted liability to breaches of the Act, so Riley J’s decision was limited to the applicable penalties.
The Ombudsman relied on section 550 of the Fair Work Act, which allows for it to pursue anyone directly involved in contraventions of the Act. Being “involved in” a contravention occurs if a person has:
As was the case in this matter, these provisions are often used when the employing entity has gone into liquidation to allow the Ombudsman to pursue individuals (although the provisions are not limited to such a scenario).
Mr Taiaroa and Mr Sanger both admitted to a failure to maintain records of hours worked by casual or irregular part-time employees and for failing to keep records of their entitlements to loadings, allowances or penalty rates. In determining the penalties, the court noted that the failure to maintain records was deliberate1. However, discounts were applied in accordance with the totality principal (this reduces penalties when there is a significant overlap in the conduct that caused the contraventions2) and in acknowledgment that both parties had admitted liability.
As such, Mr Taiaroa was ordered to pay a penalty of $41,368.00 and Mr Sanger a penalty of $26,893.00.
Nicholas Accounting Managers Services Pty Ltd and Mr Nicolaou admitted to a failure to comply with a written notice to produce issued and served by the Ombudsman to produce various documents and information in relation to its investigation into the La La entities. In determining their penalties, the court made mention of specific deterrence given both the company and Mr Nicolaou were still operating.
As such, Nicholas Accounting Managers Services Pty Ltd was ordered to pay a penalty of $34,020 and Mr Nicolaou a penalty of $35,154.00.
It is important that employers understand their obligations to comply with the Fair Work Act and note that the Ombudsman can pursue individuals involved with any contraventions.
This article is a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.
Recent decisions from various tribunals and courts have changed the operation of the VCAT. The cases of Burns v Corbett and Meringnage v Interstate Enterprises Pty Ltd (Meringnage) confirmed that the VCAT does not have the jurisdiction to hear 'federal matters', thus limiting the scope of matters it can determine.
The Fair Work Ombudsman has confirmed it is continuing investigations into the Construction, Forestry and Maritime Employees Union (CFMEU) following various allegations, including potential contraventions of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth).
A pilot program for a new National General Protections List in the Federal Court of Australia will begin on 1 September 2024 and run for eight months.
The Fair Work Ombudsman has issued proceedings in the Federal Circuit and Family Court against the operator of a residential building and construction business in south-west Sydney for allegedly failing to comply with a Compliance Notice.