AFCA systemic issues report reveals significant problems in insurance claims handling
A key issue is issues with claims handling in home insurance claims. This includes systemic issues in how a financial firm handled home building claims involving mould and unnecessary delays.
For industry participants, Systemic Issues is definitely worth a read but for those with only 2 minutes here are some key highlights:
Systemic issues across industry sectors were spread as follows:
AFCA states:
“Key issues include:
“Issues Identified AFCA’s complaint data, including several AFCA determinations, highlighted systemic issues in how a financial firm handled complex home building insurance claims involving mould and contaminants. Gaps in the firm’s processes caused:
This includes an issue where:
“A financial firm did not have adequate processes in place to ensure it was meeting its responsible lending obligations when entering into lease agreements with customers.”
“Addressing Failures in Implementing AFCA Determinations AFCA identified a reoccurrence of a previously investigated issue where a financial firm was failing to give effect to AFCA determinations within the required timeframe. Although the issue had been initially resolved in November 2022, AFCA observed a consistent increase in incidents from April 2023.”
Very interesting findings particularly for home insurance claims handling and in the implementation of determinations in banking and finance.
AFCA Systemic issues Insights report.
This article is a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.
The amount of plumbing related building defects I see in Victoria is astonishingly high. Often they exceed all other defects. Yet the insurance that should respond has become a farce.
More and more I am seeing protection works disputes become disputes about access to land, adverse possession, boundary issues, building defects and property damage.
The headline change is that many of the Code's obligations are proposed to become legally enforceable. On paper that is a significant shift.
Burns v Corbett and later decisions mean tribunals are not Chapter III courts and cannot exercise federal jurisdiction. It is time to consider a national tribunal.