AFCA systemic issues report reveals significant problems in insurance claims handling
A key issue is issues with claims handling in home insurance claims. This includes systemic issues in how a financial firm handled home building claims involving mould and unnecessary delays.
For industry participants, Systemic Issues is definitely worth a read but for those with only 2 minutes here are some key highlights:
- AFCA states it identified, investigated and resolved systemic issues that had impacted 187,855 customers!
- Reporting to regulators included 235 matters reported in the first half of the financial year. This included:
- 1 serious contravention of the law
- 177 refusals or failures of financial firms to give effect to an AFCA determination
Systemic issues across industry sectors were spread as follows:
- Banking and Finance 22 issues
- General insurance 17 issues
- Life insurance 6 issues
- Investments and advice 1 issue
- Superannuation 9 issues
Improving claims handling in insurance is a key issue
AFCA states:
“Key issues include:
- Failure to assess claims thoroughly, leading to incorrect or unfair decisions.
- Unclear or insufficient communication, causing frustration for customers.
- Delays in processing claims, which can significantly impact customers, particularly in cases involving financial hardship and customers experiencing vulnerabilities.”
“Issues Identified AFCA’s complaint data, including several AFCA determinations, highlighted systemic issues in how a financial firm handled complex home building insurance claims involving mould and contaminants. Gaps in the firm’s processes caused:
- Unnecessary delays in assessing and resolving claims.
- Inconvenience and distress for affected policyholders.
- Potential health impacts to customers due to prolonged exposure to hazardous conditions.”
For banking and finance AFCA identified responsible lending practices
This includes an issue where:
“A financial firm did not have adequate processes in place to ensure it was meeting its responsible lending obligations when entering into lease agreements with customers.”
Another key issue was with financial firms implementing determinations
“Addressing Failures in Implementing AFCA Determinations AFCA identified a reoccurrence of a previously investigated issue where a financial firm was failing to give effect to AFCA determinations within the required timeframe. Although the issue had been initially resolved in November 2022, AFCA observed a consistent increase in incidents from April 2023.”
Very interesting findings particularly for home insurance claims handling and in the implementation of determinations in banking and finance.
AFCA Systemic issues Insights report.
This article is a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.
Recent articles
-
A Satirical Look at How Professional Indemnity Claims Really Get Handled
Introducing Continuity Perpetuity, a fictional insurer whose proprietary claims methodology ensures every claim is perpetually considered and then vigorously defended.
-
Royal Commissions Spectacle or Genuine Reform
With Victoria's Royal Commission into major construction projects underway, the real question is not who gets called or charged. It is what actually comes out the other end.
-
Does Victorian Building Warranty Insurance Really Protect Subsequent Owners
A significant concern is emerging about the practical protection warranty insurance gives to people who buy a home after the building works are finished. Fall-Armytage brings it into focus.
-
How Domestic Insurers Use Cash Settlements to Underquote Repairs
Insurers increasingly offer cash settlements from preferred repairers that will not cover the cost of the actual repairs, and the scope of works proposed is often not enough.