Expert witnesses are so crucial to legal proceedings
However, I see so many expert reports prepared which fall short.
Particularly for the VCAT where the role of the person is either misunderstood or the person whose opinion is desired to be used as expert opinion has not been properly instructed or aware of their legal obligations.
Firstly:
“An expert witness is not an advocate for a party to a proceeding.”
I wish I got a dollar for every time I saw a report prepared by a proposed expert witness particularly for building or Water Act proceedings at the VCAT misunderstood this…
Secondly:
I frequently see opinions rolled out on issues beyond the expert’s expertise!
Paragraph 11 (b) of PNVCAT2 clearly sets out that the requires the experts qualifications.
Thirdly:
Scott Schedule
I have even recently viewed a report where the expert prepared a so called ‘Scott Schedule’ in the first report to the owner and for the Tribunal.
A Scott Schedule at VCAT is usually prepared for filing after witnesses meet and relates to a comparison of expert witness opinion. The Tribunal has powers to order a conclave and Scott Schedule. See paragraph 27 of the practice note.
Finally, an expert must sign a declaration that:
“I have made all the inquiries that I believe are desirable and appropriate and that no matters of significance which I regard as relevant have to my knowledge been withheld from the Tribunal.”
This article is a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.
Recent articles
-
Why Plumbing in Victoria Has No Insurance Safety Net
The amount of plumbing related building defects I see in Victoria is astonishingly high. Often they exceed all other defects. Yet the insurance that should respond has become a farce.
-
A Neighbour Is Building and Why a Protection Works Notice Is Never Just a Form
More and more I am seeing protection works disputes become disputes about access to land, adverse possession, boundary issues, building defects and property damage.
-
A New General Insurance Code of Practice but Will It Change Anything
The headline change is that many of the Code's obligations are proposed to become legally enforceable. On paper that is a significant shift.
-
The Case for a National Civil and Administrative Tribunal for Australia
Burns v Corbett and later decisions mean tribunals are not Chapter III courts and cannot exercise federal jurisdiction. It is time to consider a national tribunal.