Expert witnesses are so crucial to legal proceedings
However, I see so many expert reports prepared which fall short.
Particularly for the VCAT where the role of the person is either misunderstood or the person whose opinion is desired to be used as expert opinion has not been properly instructed or aware of their legal obligations.
“An expert witness is not an advocate for a party to a proceeding.”
I wish I got a dollar for every time I saw a report prepared by a proposed expert witness particularly for building or Water Act proceedings at the VCAT misunderstood this…
I frequently see opinions rolled out on issues beyond the expert’s expertise!
Paragraph 11 (b) of PNVCAT2 clearly sets out that the requires the experts qualifications.
Scott Schedule
I have even recently viewed a report where the expert prepared a so called ‘Scott Schedule’ in the first report to the owner and for the Tribunal.
A Scott Schedule at VCAT is usually prepared for filing after witnesses meet and relates to a comparison of expert witness opinion. The Tribunal has powers to order a conclave and Scott Schedule. See paragraph 27 of the practice note.
“I have made all the inquiries that I believe are desirable and appropriate and that no matters of significance which I regard as relevant have to my knowledge been withheld from the Tribunal.”
This article is a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.
Argument for expanding contingency fee arrangements beyond class actions to all civil litigation in Victoria, examining the benefits for clients and proper regulatory frameworks needed for implementation.
Critical information about new 28-day time limits for VCAT appeals under the Building Legislation Amendment (Buyer Protection) Act for rectification orders and first resort insurance decisions effective July 2026.
Guidance on maintaining proper boundaries between clients and expert witnesses in building, property and insurance litigation to protect legal privilege, independence and case success.
Comparison of building law duty of care obligations between Victoria and NSW, examining how subsequent homeowners' rights to sue building professionals differ dramatically between Melbourne and Sydney.