Employment law update: Fair Work Ombudsman issues proceedings against residential builder
The Fair Work Ombudsman has issued proceedings in the Federal Circuit and Family Court against the operator of a residential building and construction business in south-west Sydney for allegedly failing to comply with a Compliance Notice.
It is alleged that Mr Humza Moussa, as operator of Xteria Designs, did not pay a 15-year-old casual labourer in accordance with the Building and Construction General On-site Award 2020.
The Fair Work Ombudsman investigated Mr Moussa (who was operating the business as a sole trader) after the worker requested assistance. The inspector believes Mr Moussa did not pay the worker any wages for the final two weeks of work he performed. This resulted in the underpayment of his casual wage, casual loading and industry allowances.
A Compliance Notice, requiring Mr Moussa to back-pay the worker what he was owed under the Award, was issued in August 2022. It is alleged that Mr Moussa has not complied with the Compliance Notice.
According to the Fair Work Ombudsman, a Compliance Notice is:
“a notice issued by a Fair Work Inspector which requires an employer to fix a breach of an Australian workplace law.”
It must include the following information:
If a Compliance Notice is issued and an employer does not comply with it, the Fair Work Ombudsman can take the employer to court and seek an order for them to comply with the notice in addition to a penlty.
The Fair Work Ombudsman is seeking an order for Mr Moussa to pay the amounts allegedly owing to the employee as well as a penalty of up to $6,660.00.
A directions hearing is listed in Sydney later this month, on 28 June 2024.
The Fair Work Ombudsman, Anna Booth, said Fair Work will continue taking businesses to court to ensure compliance with workplace laws.
”Improving compliance in the building and construction industry and protecting young workers are among our top priorities,” she said.
This article is a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.
Argument for expanding contingency fee arrangements beyond class actions to all civil litigation in Victoria, examining the benefits for clients and proper regulatory frameworks needed for implementation.
Critical information about new 28-day time limits for VCAT appeals under the Building Legislation Amendment (Buyer Protection) Act for rectification orders and first resort insurance decisions effective July 2026.
Guidance on maintaining proper boundaries between clients and expert witnesses in building, property and insurance litigation to protect legal privilege, independence and case success.
Comparison of building law duty of care obligations between Victoria and NSW, examining how subsequent homeowners' rights to sue building professionals differ dramatically between Melbourne and Sydney.